The articles I include in this personal Blog will include a varied range of subjects that interest me. They will predominantly relate to the United Kingdom (my homeland), Spain and Europe. Any opinions I express will probably not be too contentious, however they are mine and not that of any organisation or group of which I am a member.
Comments
If you wish to add a comment to any of my articles please do so as I am always pleased to have a contribution from any reader as this increases the interest for other visitors.
Saturday, 17 August 2013
Thursday, 15 August 2013
Judicial Hanging!
Fifty
years ago, on the 15th
August 1963, Henry John Burnett was the last man to be hanged in
Scotland.
At
the end of his three day trial, for the murder of Thomas Guyan, he
was found guilty on the 25th
July 1963. The jury took only twenty-five minutes to complete it's
deliberation and reach it's verdict of
guilty on a 13 to 2 majority
vote.
It
was at 08:00 hours, in Craiginches Prison, Aberdeen, that Harry Allen, Chief Executioner
in the United Kingdom, carried out the sentence of the court. The
entry for cause of death on the Death Certificate of Henry John
Burnett was 'Judicial Hanging'. It's
a curious fact that the gallows used were the newest in the UK having
been built in 1962. Not only
was this the last hanging in Scotland but also the only hanging in
Aberdeen for one hundred and fifty years.
Harry
Allen was appointed Chief Executioner in October 1955 following the
retirement of Albert Pierrepont, the long-serving hangman in England who executed at least
400 people. For fourteen
years prior to his appointment as Chief Executioner Mr.
Allen had acted as assistant
to Mr Pierrepont.
On
the 20th
December 1961 Mr. Allen
carried out the last execution in Northern Ireland. This
was of Robert McGaddery, in
the Crumlin Road
Gaol, Belfast. On the 13th
August 1964; just two days short of a year after that of Henry John
Burnett; he officiated at
one of the last two
executions in the United Kingdom. He
undertook the execution of Gwynne Owen Evans in Strangeways Prison,
Manchester. At the same time, close-by in Walton Gaol, Liverpool, his
colleague Robert Leslie Stewart (Joint Chief Executioner) terminated
the life of Peter Anthony Allen. The
two deceased had been found jointly guilty of the murder of John Alen
West.
A
further execution of note on the 15th
August was that of Josef Jakobs in 1941. Found guilty
of being a German spy, he
was executed by firing squad
in the Tower of London. His was the last execution in the Tower of
London.
A year after the executions of Evans and Allen,
capital punishment was suspended as a result of 'The Murder(Abolition of Death Penalty) Act 1965'. Capital punishment for murder
was abolished in 1969 in Great Britain and in Northern Ireland in
1973.
The inclusion of
capital punishment, Judicial Murder, within the constitution and
legal system of any country is abhorrent. No civilised, humane
country should have the death penalty as a form of punishment within
its legal system. Only barbarous states and countries, execute,
murder, convicted criminals. Any religion that sanctions the use of
the death penalty is a barbaric faith.
© Elliot Sampford 2013
© Elliot Sampford 2013
Wednesday, 7 August 2013
Revolving 'Storm door structure'.
![]() |
| Image courtesy of FreeDigitalPhotos.net |
How many of you wonder, as you complete
your half-circle journey when using one, who invented the revolving
door.
Well, the answer is a Swiss-American
gentleman called Theophilus Van Kannel – Born 1841, Died 24
December 1919 – is considered as the inventor of the style of
revolving door as we know it today. It was on this date one hundred
and twenty-five years ago (7th August 1888) that he obtained the
United States patent number 387571 for his invention of a 'Storm door
structure'.
However, the first world patent was in
fact granted, six-and-one-half years before that to Theophilus, to H
Bockhacker, from Berlin, who obtained a German patent on the 22nd
December 1881 for his 'Tür ohne Luftzug' (Door without draft of
air). It was Van Kannel's design that became the commercial success.
The door was not invented, as some
people believed at that time, to stop horses entering into buildings.
It was devised as a means; to prevent
wind, dust, snow, rain and other weather elements from entering the internal space when it is used to access a building; to allow persons to
pass both in and out at the same moment in time without colliding
into each other; the exclusion of street noise intruding into the
building; and to reduce the adverse effect of the difference in air
pressure inside and outside of a property has on opening conventional
hinged-doors in the entrances of a multi-storey edifices. The original
design and specification was for a three partition door system. To
enable long objects through the revolving door a partition included a
hinge facility to allow it to be folded back.
In more recent times additional
benefits have materialized from the system. In the control of
air-conditioned environments; being an aid to energy efficiency; by
keeping warm air in, and cold air out, of a building. In security
control the system can be used to manage the flow and speed of
persons entering or leaving an area. Within the partitioned sections
a scanner can be installed to unobtrusively examine people and their
possessions.
Which way do revolving doors circulate?
The answer is – in countries which drive on the right-hand side of
the road the rotation is normally counter-clockwise whereas in those
countries (Australia and New Zealand for example) that drive on the
left it is clockwise. It means one travels round with the door the
same direction as round a roundabout when in a vehicle. However, to
add to the confusion, in the United Kingdom it can be either way. In
the City Hall in London they seemed not to be able to decide which is
best so installed a duo-counter-rotating revolving door.
For the 'Usefulness of his invention'
Van Kannel was awarded the John Scott Medal by the Franklin Institute
in 1889. The 'Storm door structure' wasn't his only invention. He
went on to develop the 'Cherry Stoner', a 'changeable fulcrum door
check', an aid to help close hinged doors automatically, and a fair
ground ride called 'Witching Waves' – this was a predecessor of the
dodgem type rides – which was installed on Coney Island, New York,
in 1907.
I wonder if you will think about
Theophilus Van Kannel next time you use a revolving door at the
supermarket, department store, office building, or airport.
Thursday, 1 August 2013
Amazon.co.uk did not tell me the truth!
I
am not at all happy with the service from Amazon.co.uk. When I
ordered on the 24th July the website showed there were three of the item I ordered in
stock. Amazon.co.uk confirmed receipt of the order which works on the
basis that the item I ordered was in stock and that it would be
delivered five to seven days later. On the 25th
July I'm told that my delivery had been dispatched – which means
it
must have been in-stock – and
I
could expect the item today
and
that amazon.co.uk had taken payment as my 'contract
to purchase' had been completed. Yesterday
(31st July) I received a telephone call asking me if I would consider accepting
a different make and different model with
different specifications as
an alternative to my ordered item.
I confirmed that I wanted what I had ordered and what had been stated
as dispatched to me.
Today I'm informed that the item I ordered had not in fact been dispatched, even-though a payment had been taken from my credit card, because they didn't have any in stock.
On the 24th July 2013, having placed an order on Amazon.co.uk, I received an email with the subject line: 'Your Order with Amazon.co.uk.' They wrote to me: 'Thanks for your order, Elliot Sampford.. . . Delivery estimate: 29 July 2013 – 1st Aug 2013.' They confirmed: 'This e-mail is only an acknowledgement of receipt of your order and your contract to purchase these items is not complete until we send you an e-mail notifying you that the items have been dispatched to you'. Fair enough.
On the 25th July 2013 I received the email entitled: 'Your Amazon.co.uk order of . . . has been dispatched.' this confirmed that my contract to purchase the item was complete. The email went on to confirm: 'Dispatch Confirmation Order # xxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx . . . We thought you'd like to know that . . . Your order is on the way, and can no longer be changed . . . Your estimated delivery date is: Thursday, August 01, 2013'. The email also confirmed that payment had been taken for the order: 'Paid by Visa: £xxx.xx.'
On the 30th July 2013 I received an email from Amazon which said: 'Dear Elliot Sampford, Thank you for placing your order with us. I tried contacting you on the telephone number that we have on file xxxxxxxxxxx but could not get through to you. In order to fulfil your order in timely manner, we instructed our supplier to process and dispatch your order directly to you. They have contacted that there is an issue with the order which we would like to discuss with you. Kindly provide your best contact phone number and a convenient time, or contact us on 084568001708.
Today I received the following email from Amazon: 'Dear Elliot Sampford, It was a pleasure speaking with you earlier. As discussed, I am sorry that we could not supply the exact item that you ordered. I have initiated a full refund for the transaction.
Why was my order accepted for an item of which they had no stock? Why was I informed that a product that didn't exist had been dispatched to me? Why was payment taken for an item that didn't exist?
I am not at all satisfied with the service from Amazon.co.uk and supplier.
I find it totally unacceptable to be mislead by any supplier of goods or services. Especially one that takes money for something that cannot be supplied because it doesn't exist.
I expect to see the refund due to me on my credit card account tomorrow.
I wonder if any of my readers have had similar problems.
Today I'm informed that the item I ordered had not in fact been dispatched, even-though a payment had been taken from my credit card, because they didn't have any in stock.
On the 24th July 2013, having placed an order on Amazon.co.uk, I received an email with the subject line: 'Your Order with Amazon.co.uk.' They wrote to me: 'Thanks for your order, Elliot Sampford.. . . Delivery estimate: 29 July 2013 – 1st Aug 2013.' They confirmed: 'This e-mail is only an acknowledgement of receipt of your order and your contract to purchase these items is not complete until we send you an e-mail notifying you that the items have been dispatched to you'. Fair enough.
On the 25th July 2013 I received the email entitled: 'Your Amazon.co.uk order of . . . has been dispatched.' this confirmed that my contract to purchase the item was complete. The email went on to confirm: 'Dispatch Confirmation Order # xxx-xxxxxxx-xxxxxxx . . . We thought you'd like to know that . . . Your order is on the way, and can no longer be changed . . . Your estimated delivery date is: Thursday, August 01, 2013'. The email also confirmed that payment had been taken for the order: 'Paid by Visa: £xxx.xx.'
On the 30th July 2013 I received an email from Amazon which said: 'Dear Elliot Sampford, Thank you for placing your order with us. I tried contacting you on the telephone number that we have on file xxxxxxxxxxx but could not get through to you. In order to fulfil your order in timely manner, we instructed our supplier to process and dispatch your order directly to you. They have contacted that there is an issue with the order which we would like to discuss with you. Kindly provide your best contact phone number and a convenient time, or contact us on 084568001708.
Today I received the following email from Amazon: 'Dear Elliot Sampford, It was a pleasure speaking with you earlier. As discussed, I am sorry that we could not supply the exact item that you ordered. I have initiated a full refund for the transaction.
Why was my order accepted for an item of which they had no stock? Why was I informed that a product that didn't exist had been dispatched to me? Why was payment taken for an item that didn't exist?
I am not at all satisfied with the service from Amazon.co.uk and supplier.
I find it totally unacceptable to be mislead by any supplier of goods or services. Especially one that takes money for something that cannot be supplied because it doesn't exist.
I expect to see the refund due to me on my credit card account tomorrow.
I wonder if any of my readers have had similar problems.
Wednesday, 31 July 2013
A unique channel crossing.
Was it a bird; was it a plane?
| images.nationalgeographic.com |
No: it was Felix Baumgartner taking a
quick trip to France without using a ferry or the channel tunnel! He
was the first person to skydive across the English channel.
It was on the 31st July 2003 (ten years ago today) at 05:09
hours, that Felix leapt out of a plane at 9000 metres above Dover, England, and headed for Cap Blanc-Nez, near Calais, France, some 35 kilometres away.
All he needed for his travel was an aerodynamic jumpsuit with a 1.8
metre XC-K1 composite carbon wing strapped to his back, a tank of
oxygen to assist his breathing, and a parachute to help him land as
safely as possible.
After exiting the plane he initially
reached speeds of 360 kilometres per hour with this reducing to 220
kph during most of his 6 minute and 22 seconds flight. Cloud cover
that early morning made his journey a little difficult and after
landing Felix said: “I couldn't see the other side so I had no
reference point. I was flying over the clouds all the time. But, in
the last 2,000 metres I could see those lights right over there so I
knew I was going to make it.” Whilst recovering from the exhausting
flight safely on French soil he told a BBC reporter: “It was total
freedom. If you step out of the aeroplane at this altitude it's
perfect because you see the sun rise . . . It's the beginning of the
day. You're totally alone, there's just you, your equipment, your
wing – and your skills. I like it.”
When I'm crossing the channel from
Dover to Calais, I think I'll stick to using my car, a train, and the
channel tunnel – even though it will take me 35 minutes.
Tuesday, 23 July 2013
Lip Dub Lincoln
A lip dub celebration across the historic heart of Lincoln. Dancing and singing along to Take That's Shine and Never Forget.
Well done Lincoln!
Read the story behind the making of Lip Dub Lincoln
Well done Lincoln!
Read the story behind the making of Lip Dub Lincoln
Skipping breakfast may increase coronary heart disease risk
The Department of Nutrition at Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, Massachusetts, have published a report based on a large 16-year study of food frequency questionnaire data and tracked health outcomes from 1992 to 2008 on 26,902 male health professionals ages 45-82. The study collected comprehensive questionnaire data from the
participants and accounted for many important factors such as TV
watching, physical activity, sleep, diet quality, alcohol intake,
medical history, BMI, and social factors like whether or not the men
worked full-time, were married, saw their doctor regularly for physical
exams, or smoked currently or in the past.
The conclusion finds men who reported that they skipped breakfast had higher risk of heart attack or death from coronary heart disease. The timing of meals, whether it's missing a meal in the morning or eating a meal very late at night, may cause adverse metabolic effects that lead to coronary heart disease. Even after accounting for modest differences in diet, physical activity, smoking and other lifestyle factors, the association between skipping breakfast (or eating very late at night) and coronary heart disease persisted.
Read more details in ScienceDaily: Skipping breakfast may increase coronary heart disease risk
The conclusion finds men who reported that they skipped breakfast had higher risk of heart attack or death from coronary heart disease. The timing of meals, whether it's missing a meal in the morning or eating a meal very late at night, may cause adverse metabolic effects that lead to coronary heart disease. Even after accounting for modest differences in diet, physical activity, smoking and other lifestyle factors, the association between skipping breakfast (or eating very late at night) and coronary heart disease persisted.
Read more details in ScienceDaily: Skipping breakfast may increase coronary heart disease risk
Saturday, 13 July 2013
No Inflatables -- Colchonetas No
![]() | ||
| What could be the repercussions of ignoring this rule? |
Mark and Jane were
enjoying their two-week honeymoon, staying in her parent's Spanish
holiday villa, in a compact residential urbanization in the Costa
Blanca. They had been married on Jane's twenty-first birthday and
Mark is almost three years older.
It was the seventh
day of their married life. The cloudless azure sky was offering no
protection from the searing heat of the blazing fireball directly
above them. To try to cool themselves they decided to use the
communal swimming pool for a refreshing dip in the crystal clear
water. It was only the second day that they had used the facility.
On the previous
occasion, two days before, it had been brought to their attention, by
two of the older and permanent residents within the complex, that the
use of inflatable air-beds or similar objects was not permitted in
the pool area. George, a placid and polite gentlemen, on entering the
area and seeing Mark and Jane's inflatable armchair floating on the
water had said: “It's not Edith's and my intention to be killjoys
but air-bed type things are not permitted in the pool. The rules
displayed on the poolside notice board clearly confirm this fact.”
“My parents own
part of this pool so the rules don't apply to us. The rules are only
for visitors so we'll do what we want when we want,” retorted Jane.
“The rules are for
the safety of everyone using the area,” Edith replied amicably.
“It's a stupid
rule,” said Mark, adding as an afterthought, “and we don't need
boring old farts telling us what to do.”
From the solarium of
the villa they could see that no one else was in the pool area so
they decided to continue to ignore the rules and for the second time
take the fuchsia blow-up armchair for Jane to use on the water. Mark
had purchased the throne for his princess on their visit to the
beach, at the start of their holiday, as it was in her favourite
colour.
Although both she and Mark were adequate swimmers, Jane found the movement of the floating armchair on the water, when Mark created breaking waves each time he performed one of his show-off dives, a little unnerving. She liked to keep the buoyant armchair close; within a steadying arm's reach; to the promenade edge of the pool to ensure she wasn't tipped over into the water. Especially today as she didn't want to get her hair wet.
After fifteen
minutes of Jane sitting relaxed and regal in the floating princess'
throne and Mark getting bored with executing his mediocre range of
dives he said: “Come on Jane you can't sit there all of the time,
get in and have a swim.”
“No; I've told you
as we're going out tonight I don't want to get my hair wet. That
travel hair dryer is useless.”
“Never mind that
I'm sure I've seen a more powerful one in your mum's wardrobe.”
With that Mark dived
into the water. Keeping himself underwater, as close to the bottom of
the pool as possible, he swam towards Jane and positioned himself
directly under the inflatable, invisible to her sitting relaxed
above. He bent his legs, bringing his knees as close to his chest as
possible, with his feet touching the base of the pool. He stretched
his arms straight-up towards the underside of Jane's floating haven
and uncoiled his ranine legs, pushing hard onto the floor to give him
maximum speed towards the surface. The combination of the forces, of
his hands hitting the armchair and the bow wave created by his rapid
movement through the water, threw Jane from the lifting, capsizing
inflatable towards the side of the pool. Everything happened so
quickly and unexpectedly that she wasn't able to react to protect
herself. Her scream was silenced when her head crashed into the
overhanging kerb-stone of the pool edge.
Pleased with his
successful torpedoing of Jane into the water, Mark quickly swam
underwater to the shallow end of the pool to protect himself from the
anticipated wrath of Jane, by putting distance between the two of
them. On surfacing, his underwater internal chuckling changed to
external raucous laughing. His eyes were drawn first to the large
fuchsia island floating upside-down on the far side of the pool. He
looked for Jane, expecting to see her rapidly swimming towards him to
reap her revenge. But she wasn't: Jane was lying face down,
motionless in the water.
He waited a few
moments anticipating a sudden movement when she would start her
attack. She remained still: the only movement was the effect of the
ripples in the water on her body. He thought she couldn't hold her
breath much longer. She didn't raise her head to breathe.
“Come on Jane,
enough is enough, stop mucking about.” He waited for a reaction –
there wasn't one.
“Jane! Stop it!”
he shouted and speedily swam towards her.
On reaching her, he
grabbed hold of her shoulder that was furthest away from him and
pulled it towards himself to roll her onto her back. He expected her
to attack him but she lay motionless. There was no gasping for
breath. Her glassy eyes were staring skywards. Her lips had a light
blue hue. There was a large graze and bruising to her temple. She was
unconscious.
Mark knew he had to
get Jane out of the water and get her breathing. He pushed her to
the side of the pool. He tried to lift her out but the water was too
deep; he couldn't stand on the bottom; so each time he tried, her
weight pushed him underwater. He leapt out of the water onto the
side, and tried to lift her from there. He couldn't hold on to her
wet body, her flimsy bikini didn't give him enough fabric to grip
hold of, and she was too heavy for him on his own. They were alone in
the swimming pool area.
He started shouting:
“Help . . . Help . . . I need help here!”
There wasn't any
response. No one seemed to be about. It was the middle of siesta
time, the hottest part of the day, so most sensible people were
indoors in the cool shade.
The only way he was
going to get her out of the water was to move her to the shallow end.
He grabbed hold of her hand and pulled her along like a floating
manikin.
He continued
shouting: “Help . . . Help . . . I need help here in the pool!”
Once he'd got Jane
to where he thought the water was shallow enough Mark jumped into the
water alongside her. He put his arms underneath Jane and started to
lift her. As soon as her body was level with the beige kerb-stones he
rolled her away from himself towards the safety of dry land.
He heard a male
voice, from the area of the entrance gate into the pool area: “Hello
in there, how can I help you?”
“My wife has had
an accident in the water. I don't think she's breathing. Please come
and help me.”
“The gate is
locked. I can't get in.”
“I'll get our key
and come and let you in.” Mark said as he rushed to where Jane and
he had put their towels. He couldn't find it. “I can't find the
bunch of keys. Where the hell is it. . . Damn she must have had it
with her sunglasses and mobile phone in the cup holder in the
armchair. As it's turned over they're all at the bottom of the pool.
Please call 112 and tell them I need an ambulance for her urgently.”
“No problem. I'll
also go and find someone who's got a key so the medics can get in
when they arrive. I'll get some extra help.”
Mark knew he had to
do something to start Jane breathing. He hadn't had any training in
giving CPR but he'd seen it being enacted in television programmes.
He had to try. Anything was better than nothing.
George and Edith had
risen from their siesta and as they leisurely approached the pool
area for their daily rejuvenating swim they could see the fuchsia
inflatable and Mark leaning over Jane, his arms outstretched in front
of himself, repeatedly pushing down on her chest.
“What game are
those two love-birds up-to now? We could do without rudeness from
them again,” said George.
“There's something
wrong George, I can sense it, come on hurry-up let's get in there.”
“She's not
breathing; I can't get her to breathe; I don't know what I'm supposed
to do!” shouted Mark when they reached him.
“Come on son, get
up out the way, let Edith deal with this; she's a retired accident
and emergency nurse. I'll do my bit by calling 'Emergencies' on 112.”
He refrained from mentioning to Mark that they might be old but they
weren't useless old farts. Now was not the time – perhaps later.
Edith went into
automatic mode. She knelt down beside Jane, placed one hand over the
other, fingers interlocked, on her patients breastbone, in-line with
the nipples, and started the rapid depressions. She was thinking to
herself: 'Push 1, 2, 3 . . . . 28, 29,30. Hold the head back; make
sure the airway is clear; pinch the nose; cover the mouth and
blow in two breaths. Push 1, 2, 3 . . .
It was nearly twelve
minutes, although it seemed like hours had passed, before they heard
the duo-tone siren of the SUMA ambulance coming to help. George had
ensured that the entrance gates to the complex and the swimming pool
had been secured open to allow the medics fast, easy access. Edith
was tiring; her energy and strength almost used up doing CPR during
the long wait; and relieved to hand over to the ambulance team. She
was despondent, distraught that she hadn't managed to get Jane to
return.
The conclusion of
the investigation carried out by the Guardia Civil officers who
attended the scene was that it was an unfortunate case of accidental
death. Jane had become unbalanced when she climbed onto the
inflatable armchair, that contrary to the rules of the complex was
being used in the swimming pool. She had slipped, fallen, hit the
temple part of her head on the poolside kerb-stone, and drowned as a
result of being unconscious and lying face down for too long a time
in the water. The medical autopsy revealed Jane had a thinning of the
skull in the region of her temple resulting in a fracture and an
intra cranial haemorrhage.
Mark had been the
only witness to what had actually happened and why. He knows who is
truly responsible for Jane losing her life; for him becoming a
widower at twenty-four years of age; for Jane's parents losing their
only daughter.
Will he ignore
safety rules in the future?
© Elliot Sampford 2013
© Elliot Sampford 2013
Thursday, 11 July 2013
Link between omega-3 fatty acids and increased prostate cancer risk confirmed
A second large, prospective study by scientists at Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center has confirmed the link between high blood concentrations of omega-3 fatty acids and an increased risk of prostate cancer.
The latest findings indicate that high concentrations of EPA, DPA and DHA -- the three anti-inflammatory and metabolically related fatty acids derived from fatty fish and fish-oil supplements -- are associated with a 71 percent increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer. The study also found a 44 percent increase in the risk of low-grade prostate cancer and an overall 43 percent increase in risk for all prostate cancers.
The increase in risk for high-grade prostate cancer is important because those tumors are more likely to be fatal.
Alan Kristal, Dr.P.H., the senior author of the report that was published on the 11th July in the online edition of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, and member of the Fred Hutch Public Health Sciences Division is quoted as saying: "We've shown once again that use of nutritional supplements may be harmful."
Read more in ScienceDaily: Link between omega-3 fatty acids and increased prostate cancer risk confirmed
The latest findings indicate that high concentrations of EPA, DPA and DHA -- the three anti-inflammatory and metabolically related fatty acids derived from fatty fish and fish-oil supplements -- are associated with a 71 percent increased risk of high-grade prostate cancer. The study also found a 44 percent increase in the risk of low-grade prostate cancer and an overall 43 percent increase in risk for all prostate cancers.
The increase in risk for high-grade prostate cancer is important because those tumors are more likely to be fatal.
Alan Kristal, Dr.P.H., the senior author of the report that was published on the 11th July in the online edition of the Journal of the National Cancer Institute, and member of the Fred Hutch Public Health Sciences Division is quoted as saying: "We've shown once again that use of nutritional supplements may be harmful."
Read more in ScienceDaily: Link between omega-3 fatty acids and increased prostate cancer risk confirmed
Tuesday, 9 July 2013
Garden Reclamation
![]() |
| Where's my lawn gone? |
Last Thursday we returned home, after
our ten weeks visit to Spain, to find our neatly mown back-garden
lawn; not quite up to the standard of a tennis court; had turned
into a meadow and the previously tidy shrubberies looking like
miniature jungles. The grass had grown to knee level for
an average height person but for a shorty like me it was up to my
thigh.
On Friday afternoon, assisted only by
my middle-aged electric hover lawnmower, I began my garden reclamation. I
couldn't delay the start as the rotary washing line had to be brought
into use, without delay, and part of is circle of operation was above
the lawn. After working for a nearly two hours in the heat from the
blazing sun in the cloudless azure sky, and the added fact that the
Wimbledon Men's Semi-final was being shown on the television, I
stopped for the day with only part of the task done.
![]() |
| I've almost found it! |
Three more mornings of half-day
working; had to take into account the Wimbledon Finals on Saturday
and Sunday, and the afternoon siesta periods; were needed to return
the lawn, its edging, and neighbouring nine inches wide strips of
the edges of the shrubberies back to some resemblance of acceptability. The cut
grass is looking beige and dry but the emerald green hue will soon
return.
![]() |
| There it is! |
During the time of my labours I was
constantly under the observation of the resident family of
Blackbirds. They were vigilantly inquisitive, seemingly happy that
they could probe for worms and grubs on the newly cut area. They
were venturing very close to me, and my hover, quickly moving into
fresh pastures beige.
![]() |
| It's keeping its eye on me. |
Labels:
Birds,
Environment,
Garden,
Lincoln,
Photography,
Property,
UK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)










